Strict Implication

From Symbolic Logic by Clarence Irving Lewis and Cooper Harold Langford, 1932/1959. Primitive connectives, ~,  /\ , and <>. Disjunction is defined as usual, and strict implication is defined by (P ==> Q) abbreviates ~<>(P /\ ~ Q). (The notation here is not the same as the original.) Also define strict equivalence by P = Q abbreviates (P ==> Q)  /\ (Q ==> P).

Rules:

  1. If P = Q has been proved, replacing P in an expression with Q produces an equivalent expression.
  2. From P and Q conclude P  /\ Q
  3. From P and P ==> Q conclude Q

Axioms:

  1. (P  /\ Q) ==> (Q  /\ P)
  2. (P  /\ Q) ==> P
  3. P ==> (P  /\ P)
  4. ((P  /\ Q)  /\ R) ==> (P  /\ (Q  /\ R))
  5. P ==>~~ P
  6. ((P ==> Q)  /\ (Q ==> R)) ==> (P ==> R)
  7. (P  /\ (P ==> Q)) ==> Q

This much gives system S1. Adding the following gives S2. <>(P  /\ Q) ==><>P

S4 is the set 1-7, together with <><>P ==><>P It includes S2.

Material implication can be introduced by setting P > Q to mean ~ (P /\ ~ Q). It will have its classical properties, but is different than strict implication.